Our verdict

Zodiac is an online casino operating at zodiac.casino. The brand dates from 2002.

The operator does not name a company or licensing authority anywhere Rixer could read on its own site, which is itself worth knowing.

The site advertises balances in USD. Those are the names printed on its own pages, not supply deals Rixer has verified with the providers.

8 Reddit threads naming Zodiac rank in Google; 13 review videos appear on YouTube; 9 news results mention the brand. Everything in this paragraph is reported by other people: Rixer records that the claims were made and does not endorse them.

Rixer has not opened an account here, has not tested a withdrawal, and has no complaint case data for this brand yet. We also found no licensing authority, no named operating company, no Trustpilot presence. Until those gaps are closed this page is a record of what is publicly knowable, not a recommendation.

Shown in English: no approved translation exists for this language yet.

Rixer has not reviewed this casino yet. It is listed because we track it, not because we recommend it — there is no verdict here beyond what its own site says.

Independent review. Rixer is not affiliated with Zodiac. Rixer has no commercial relationship with this casino.

Select your country in the top bar to check availability.

Can you trust Zodiac?

45/100

Mixed. Enough came back badly that the weak points below are the point.

Worked out from 8 of the 8 things we look at.

👍 What is good

  • Responsible gambling 100/100
    Has a dedicated responsible-gambling page, covering self-exclusion, deposit or session limits, a named help service.
  • Review reputation 88/100
    Rated 4.50/5 on Trustpilot across 6,953 review(s) — a substantial sample. Rixer reads the platform's own published aggregate and weights it by volume; it does not audit whether individual reviews are genuine.
  • Social reputation 75/100
    Found a substantial amount of public discussion — 8 Reddit thread(s) and 13 video(s). Rixer records that discussion exists; it does not read sentiment into it, because social volume is easy to buy.

👎 What is not

  • Safety & licensing 0/100
    Rixer read this operator's own pages and found no licensing authority named anywhere. Scored as no recourse — that is a statement about what is published, not an accusation.
  • Company reputation 30/100
    Found 2 of 4 news item(s) about Apollo Entertainment Ltd whose headlines suggest regulatory or legal trouble, beginning “AGCO hands huge fine to Apollo Entertainment over RG violations”. Rixer has NOT verified these stories or confirmed they concern this brand's operations — they lower the score as a flag for review, and the citation is published so a reader can judge for themselves.
  • Product quality 30/100
    No game supplier we recognise is named anywhere on the site. That is unusual for a real casino and may mean white-label software or a games list rendered only after login.
How we worked this out
Safety & licensing 0

Rixer read this operator's own pages and found no licensing authority named anywhere. Scored as no recourse — that is a statement about what is published, not an accusation.

Responsible gambling 100

Has a dedicated responsible-gambling page, covering self-exclusion, deposit or session limits, a named help service.

Transparency & disclosure 40

Publishes the operating company, a contact route. Does not publish a licence number, a company registration number, a postal address.

Review reputation 88

Rated 4.50/5 on Trustpilot across 6,953 review(s) — a substantial sample. Rixer reads the platform's own published aggregate and weights it by volume; it does not audit whether individual reviews are genuine.

Social reputation 75

Found a substantial amount of public discussion — 8 Reddit thread(s) and 13 video(s). Rixer records that discussion exists; it does not read sentiment into it, because social volume is easy to buy.

Company reputation 30

Found 2 of 4 news item(s) about Apollo Entertainment Ltd whose headlines suggest regulatory or legal trouble, beginning “AGCO hands huge fine to Apollo Entertainment over RG violations”. Rixer has NOT verified these stories or confirmed they concern this brand's operations — they lower the score as a flag for review, and the citation is published so a reader can judge for themselves.

Longevity & footprint 55

The site says it was founded in 2002. No registry date is available for the domain, so this is the operator's own claim and is scored cautiously.

Product quality 30

No game supplier we recognise is named anywhere on the site. That is unusual for a real casino and may mean white-label software or a games list rendered only after login.

High confidence · model v3 · evidence coverage 1,00

How Rixer scores casinos

What has changed
  • company_reputation: 70 → 30 2026-09-06 — Found 2 of 4 news item(s) about Apollo Entertainment Ltd whose headlines suggest regulatory or legal trouble, beginning “AGCO hands huge fine to Apollo Entertainment over RG violations”. Rixer has NOT verified these stories or confirmed they concern this brand's operations — they lower the score as a flag for review, and the citation is published so a reader can judge for themselves.
  • review_reputation: 88 2026-09-06 — Rated 4.50/5 on Trustpilot across 6,953 review(s) — a substantial sample. Rixer reads the platform's own published aggregate and weights it by volume; it does not audit whether individual reviews are genuine.
  • company_reputation: 70 2026-09-06 — We searched the news for Apollo Entertainment Ltd and found no coverage at all. No adverse findings, but also no independent record of the company operating.
  • social_reputation: 75 2026-09-06 — Found a substantial amount of public discussion — 8 Reddit thread(s) and 13 video(s). Rixer records that discussion exists; it does not read sentiment into it, because social volume is easy to buy.
  • responsible_gambling: 100 2026-09-06 — Has a dedicated responsible-gambling page, covering self-exclusion, deposit or session limits, a named help service.
  • longevity_footprint: 55 2026-09-06 — The site says it was founded in 2002. No registry date is available for the domain, so this is the operator's own claim and is scored cautiously.
  • safety_licensing: 0 2026-09-06 — Rixer read this operator's own pages and found no licensing authority named anywhere. Scored as no recourse — that is a statement about what is published, not an accusation.
  • product_quality: 30 2026-09-06 — No game supplier we recognise is named anywhere on the site. That is unusual for a real casino and may mean white-label software or a games list rendered only after login.
  • transparency: 40 2026-09-06 — Publishes the operating company, a contact route. Does not publish a licence number, a company registration number, a postal address.

Is Zodiac legit? Licence, ownership and complaint record

Licence none verified
Operator unknown
Operating since 2002 (24 yrs)
Status Under Review
Public complaints 0
Safety caps none active

Official website — and lookalikes that are not Zodiac

  • zodiac.casino — Official [reported_unverified, checked 2026-09-06]

Some of this page has not been translated into DE yet and is shown in English.

What the open web says about Zodiac

Collected from public search results — news, Reddit and video. Rixer records that these claims were made and links to the source; it does not endorse them, and a headline is not a finding. Regulatory and legal news is usually reported against the operating company rather than the brand, so both are searched.

Google News — brand 9

Reddit thread 8

YouTube video 1

What we have not checked yet

Listed rather than left blank. An empty section here means nobody has looked, which is a different thing from having looked and found nothing — and neither counts against the casino in its score.

  • Payment methods, fees and processing times
  • Game providers
  • Licences, verified against a register
  • Which countries it accepts
  • The evidence log

What Zodiac says about itself

Established2002reported
CurrenciesUSDlisted on site

Read from the operator's own pages. Not checked against any register.